Skip to content

Pope Francis and the Animals–Day 2

stfrancis-031413

With all the talk in the media about the new pope's adoption of the name Francis, after the patron saint of animals, the only mention I've heard of anything to do with animals (other than the human kind) was in a few humorous reports about how a seagull was seen perching on the "Holy Smokes" chimney that announced the election of the new pope.

Gull-Sistine-Chapel-031413Beyond that, nothing.

Nothing from the religious commentators; nothing from the news media. One of the most famous and popular saints in history, known primarily for his concern for the animals. And no mention of the animals at all. Nor any mention of St. Francis in relation to them.

Nothing.

We have a new pope, round-the-clock news coverage, reporters and commentators all over the world talking about St. Francis of Assisi, and not a word about whether this might relate to how we live our lives in relation to our fellow animals.

What does this complete silence say about us?

Very simply that we humans are entirely self-obsessed.

A few hundred years ago we assumed that we were the physical center of the universe. Our telescopes may have proved that that's not the case. But we still consider ourselves to be the absolute center of our moral, intellectual and spiritual universe.

Anyone looking at us from outside would see at a glance that, far from being the center of the universe and the pinnacle of evolution or creation, we humans are a remarkably unintelligent species, incapable of relating to each other or anything else, consumed with violence and constantly at war, fouling our own habitat, and riddled with anxiety and depression. Worse, we've already brought on a massive extinction of species and a change in climate that will affect all life for centuries, probably millennia, to come. And every day it gets worse.

Yesterday, the new spiritual leader of billions of humans reminded us of the one saint of his church who had dedicated his life to thinking not only about us humans, but about other animals, too.

You'd think this might be the big news of the day – especially at exactly the same time as a major international conference (CITES) is once again coming up largely empty-handed over whether and how to stem the horrific extinction of thousands of species.

If there is to be any redemption for humankind, it lies not in thinking about ourselves, but on what we can do to make peace, here on Earth, with our fellow animals and the world of nature.

But no. Today what we heard about most was how the new pope got on a bus with his colleagues and paid his hotel bill himself. All of which is memorable, indeed, but again, ultimately, all about us humans.

There have been a few mentions of the prophecies of another Catholic saint, Malachy, a 12th-Century Irish bishop who is reputedly the author of a series of prophecies about future popes. The writings consist of 112 short Latin phrases about popes, starting with St. Peter and concluding with a pontiff who is the last in the line, and whose election to the office signals the end times.

Pope Francis is that 112th pope.

Most Catholic intellectuals are familiar with the Malachy prophecies. Whether or not they mean anything is not the point, but what is certainly the case is that the new pope and his cardinals are aware of these writings and that what Malachy wrote would at least remind them that we humans are destroying our world, each other and our fellow animals.

For anyone who holds the faith of St. Francis, it would surely be impossible not to be considering that the only way forward for humankind would be to follow the example of the patron saint of animals, to make some effort to let go of our total obsession with ourselves, and, instead, to give some consideration to our responsibility toward the rest of creation.

If there is to be any redemption for humankind, it lies not in thinking about ourselves, our salvation, our place in heaven and our endless reflection on me, myself and I; but rather to consider what we can do to make peace, here on Earth, with our fellow animals and the world of nature; from which we work so hard and so helplessly to separate ourselves.

«    •    Main    •    »
11 comments
Nancy Janes
Nancy Janes

The question I have had about this petition is, "but the church is against birth control".  Yes, for humans, right or wrong.  But since they do not consider animals as equal, as having a soul, then these rules should not apply to the animals, correct?  You cannot have it both ways.....in my opinion.

Imagine what a statement asking the "flock" to spay/neuter animals would do for the over-population of unwanted animals, many of whom are allowed to breed and be miserable due to religious beliefs.

Julie Palais
Julie Palais

Great piece on just exactly what I have been wondering about!

tom cushing
tom cushing

Michael: without drawing too many parallels with other aspects of the new Pope's religious tradition, there may be less to St. Francis' vaunted love of animals than meets the casual eye.  Quoting from scholar Kathryn Shevelow's excellent "For the Love of Animals:"

 

"Although recent scholarship has called into question St. Francis's credentials as an animal protector (he advocates respect for beasts in his writing, but never actually calls for compassion for them), his status as the Catholic Church's best-known friend of animals remains firm..." (p. 36)

 

Now, 'respect' ain't nothing (just ask St. Aretha), but neither is it necessarily much.  I'm not sure you'd even concur in the famous Wolf of Gubbio legend, wherein he convinces the beast to give up his wolfly essence, because of its claimed evilness.  So much for telos.

michaelmountain
michaelmountain moderator

 @tom cushing

Yes, indeed, Tom. Anyone looking for a true animal protection model would do better to go with the likes of Pythagoras and Ovid - both committed vegans. Ovid wrote (in translation):  Take not away the live you cannot give  For all things have an equal right to live.Francis seems to have been more into preaching to the animals. He was a person of his time, and seems not to have quite transcended that.  Still, he remains the patron saint of animals, so I guess it's not about following his literal example but rather his symbolic life. I'm hearing from people in Argentina that the new pope is not really into animals. We don't even know if his adopted name refers to Francis of Assisi or Francis Xavier the Jesuit. Whatever, I doubt we'll be seeing much from the church (or indeed any church) about transforming our relationship with the other animals. But would be happy to be surprised .....

M.

Mary Finelli
Mary Finelli

Word has it that Argentinian activists say he is not very pro-animal but we shall see.

ingridtaylar
ingridtaylar like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

Thank you for posting this. I've noted this galling omission in recent days, and it solidifies for me what you say here -- about the destructive and narcissistic effect we have on every species, including our own.